Visting ServerFault this morning there were a large number of old questions (posted 2009) that have been edited and therefore bumped to the front page. While I find this highly irritaing as it is, two of these questions were already closed (one | two) so apart from having the questions bumped to the front page and a tag added they have very little use.

I would go so far to ask that tag-only edits don't bump the question.

link
Totally agree about not bumping closed questions, not sure about not bumping after tag change - after all it will cause the correct people to see it won't it? – Shadow Wizard Jun 13 '11 at 7:57
@Shadow, the majority of these questions have answers already so maybe in this case you are right. How about "Don't bump after tag change if accepted"? – tombull89 Jun 13 '11 at 8:00
If there is no bump after a tag change, it is less lickly that a invalid tab change will get stored out. – Ian Ringrose Jun 13 '11 at 8:09
sounds good, however looks like it won't go through. :/ – Shadow Wizard Jun 13 '11 at 9:32
feedback

migrated from meta.stackoverflow.com Jun 13 '11 at 8:10

This question came from our site for the Stack Exchange engine powering these sites.

2 Answers

up vote 6 down vote accepted

You should take that up with squillman (and this should not be asked here, so I am migrating it back to meta.sf)

http://serverfault.com/users/1054/squillman?tab=activity

Our policy has been stated many times on this -- edits bump the post to the homepage so that the community can vet the changes, exactly like what is happening now.

link
Sorry for the spamming, Jeff... See my comment on @sysadmin 's answer. – squillman Jun 13 '11 at 14:21
feedback

As Jeff said, this is done on purpose and isn't going to change. Edits need vetting, tag-edits perhaps more so since the rep requirements to do them are a lot lower. We haven't had much edit-abuse here on SF, thankfully, but we do need to keep bumping anything that gets edited.

Where it gets annoying is when someone is doing a manual retag of a bunch of questions. A month or two ago we were doing much the same with the tag (well, mostly Iain did), which required going through hundreds of questions. It also took a long time since the etiquette most of us follow is to do a few at a time to avoid spamming the heck out of the main page and push legitimate new questions w-a-y down where they won't get attention.

link
How about a checkbox visible for members with, say, 2k+ rep that says "Don't bump to front page". This would prevent flooding the page with edited questions in the scenario you just described? – tombull89 Jun 13 '11 at 12:01
@tom I think it was also fairly mild in this case, you're talking about, what.. 6-8 posts? I don't support a "make my edit secret so nobody can double-check it" checkbox, by the way. – Jeff Atwood Jun 13 '11 at 12:15
@Jeff your point is fair, for 8 posts. For @SysAdmin1138's mass retag a button would be useful, although (due to the "hide it and hope no-one notices" abuse potential) I did suggest a minimum rep (or even mod status). – tombull89 Jun 13 '11 at 12:25
Yes, that's on me and I am sorry for the homepage spam. Sorry guys, I'll keep it to a minimum if I do that again. In this case I was retagging questions that had the single sysadmin tag hoping that we could kill that tag (from a previous request I posted). – squillman Jun 13 '11 at 14:20
@squill do you want the [sysadmin] tag destroyed? I can do that – Jeff Atwood Jun 13 '11 at 21:03
@Jeff Yes, see my question from a while back - meta.serverfault.com/questions/1341/… – squillman Jun 13 '11 at 21:08
@squillman, sorry, I should have contacted you through other means than M.SO/M.SF. Thanks, though. – tombull89 Jun 20 '11 at 12:48
feedback

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged