Timeline for Chat activity for election nominees
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2011 at 21:01 | comment | added | John Gardeniers | I heartily agree. On a personal level, while I am reading all the discussions related to the election (but not using chat) my voting will be determined not by what is being said or done NOW. Rather, it will be based on the how the candidates have interacted with the community over time, because I see that as far more important. Besides, we're all only too familiar with how people (think politicians) act around election time. ;) | |
| Jan 24, 2011 at 19:34 | vote | accept | Mark Henderson | ||
| Jan 24, 2011 at 19:34 | comment | added | Mark Henderson | I'm glad to hear it | |
| Jan 24, 2011 at 19:24 | comment | added | Mark Henderson | @bapd - as a mod on another SE site I have to agree with you there, although I feel this could be much better improved by an official changelog. | |
| Jan 24, 2011 at 9:38 | comment | added | badp | One thing I noticed about pro-tem moderator who don't chat is that they tend to fall behind on the news of what they are able to do how, which I assume are relayed first on the mod-only chat rooms. | |
| Jan 24, 2011 at 9:34 | history | answered | Jeff Atwood | CC BY-SA 2.5 |