Timeline for Why can't people upvote their own questions?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2011 at 14:52 | vote | accept | Russell C | ||
| Feb 18, 2011 at 2:27 | comment | added | Jeff Atwood | as Robert said, everything you post has an implicit upvote by you -- there's no value in making it explicit | |
| Feb 18, 2011 at 2:26 | answer | added | John Gardeniers | timeline score: 4 | |
| Feb 17, 2011 at 22:54 | comment | added | Russell C | fair point, fair point. | |
| Feb 17, 2011 at 22:51 | comment | added | Rob Moir | You have to remember this isn't reddit. I spend time there too - Reddit's a place for following links, talking about nonsense and getting in a lather about this week's liberal cause du jour. ServerFault is a place for asking and answering questions. Whole different site philosophies, obviously. So what would be the point of upvoting your own answer on SF? Surely if you don't think its a good answer then you simply wouldn't post it? Or you'd just delete it if you realised afterwards that it was flawed? | |
| Feb 17, 2011 at 22:47 | answer | added | sysadmin1138Mod | timeline score: 9 | |
| Feb 17, 2011 at 22:43 | history | asked | Russell C | CC BY-SA 2.5 |