Timeline for Can the links to useful chat rooms be made permanent?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
19 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2011 at 20:31 | vote | accept | Ward - Trying CodidactMod | ||
| Mar 10, 2011 at 21:23 | comment | added | balpha StaffMod | @Iain: That may be a viable feature request (although I'm not 100% sure I'd like it), but it shouldn't be here in the comments. Maybe read this thread on MSO first and then possibly open a new feature request there. | |
| Mar 10, 2011 at 21:16 | comment | added | user9517 | @balpha any chance of highlighting to 3k+ users closeable questions rathre than just 10k+ users ? | |
| Mar 10, 2011 at 19:53 | comment | added | balpha StaffMod | @Zoredache: we made the room choosing algorithm a little smarter yesterday; seems to work quite well so far. I'll keep an eye on it. | |
| Mar 10, 2011 at 19:28 | comment | added | Zoredache | @balpha, perhaps take into account total room activity or number of favorites votes instead of just recent activity for the sidebar selection? | |
| Mar 10, 2011 at 19:27 | answer | added | Zoredache | timeline score: 2 | |
| Mar 4, 2011 at 10:09 | comment | added | user9517 | With a little more research the numbers are 135 who can vote to close of which 29 are 10K+ so anything that can get more eye's on closable questions would be a benefit. | |
| Mar 4, 2011 at 9:56 | comment | added | user9517 | Can we have the tab=close page visible to everyone who can cast a vote please ? There are relatively few 10K users on SF compared to the number of 3k users who can vote. | |
| Mar 4, 2011 at 6:05 | comment | added | balpha StaffMod | @ChrisS: It's behind that "tools" link that appeared on top of the page when you passed 10k reputation (these pages's aren't visible for <10k users) | |
| Mar 3, 2011 at 21:49 | comment | added | Chris S | @balpha, yes, now if I could get a link from the front page it'd be perfect. | |
| Mar 3, 2011 at 20:52 | comment | added | balpha StaffMod | @ChrisS: You mean a page like this? :) | |
| Mar 3, 2011 at 20:28 | comment | added | Chris S | @Jscott, I personally like the vote to close room; It'd be nice if we just had a page that filtered all the questions with a vote to close in the last day, so we could review them easily. It would be nice if there was a 'featured' flag, or if rooms with <3 people were excluded from the list. | |
| Mar 3, 2011 at 18:35 | history | edited | Ward - Trying CodidactMod | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
got rid of confusing term "userful"
|
| Mar 3, 2011 at 11:22 | comment | added | jscott | I think the Vote To Close channel is redundant. It's annoying to have to monitor a second chat just for potential closes. You get more eyeballs (and response) from the Comms Room anyway. | |
| Mar 3, 2011 at 10:47 | comment | added | Marc Gravell | We could perhaps flag rooms created as a 1-1 basis (via the menu option), and just exclude those? | |
| Mar 3, 2011 at 10:31 | comment | added | John Gardeniers | For me none of the chat rooms are useful, so obviously I don't think there should be permanent links to any of them. | |
| Mar 3, 2011 at 7:51 | comment | added | balpha StaffMod | How is useful then defined? Currently, the chat "ad" just show the last two active serverfault-themed rooms. Are you suggesting that, say, a moderator can make a room "featured"? Or that the room chosing be smarter, and if so, in what way? Or just that "On Server Fault, always show Comms Room and Vote to Close "? | |
| Mar 3, 2011 at 7:47 | history | edited | balphaStaffMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Mar 3, 2011 at 7:00 | history | asked | Ward - Trying CodidactMod | CC BY-SA 2.5 |