Timeline for Why was this packet sniffing question closed?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2011 at 7:25 | comment | added | Jeff Atwood | err.. I would not say 'three solid answers' when two of them are, literally "SEE THIS LINK! CLICK!" | |
| Apr 27, 2011 at 0:57 | comment | added | John Gardeniers | If we judged every question by the number of answers then even worst of them would suddenly appear to be great questions. No, sorry, just because it was answered doesn't make it a good question, before or after the edit. Besides, the context suggests to me that the OP is not a professional admin. His bio confirms it. The question is therefore off-topic as well. | |
| Apr 26, 2011 at 21:07 | comment | added | Chris S | Not really related to this one, but "Not a Real Question" is often what I pick when its something a SA really should know already. | |
| Apr 26, 2011 at 16:34 | history | answered | Doug Luxem | CC BY-SA 3.0 |