Skip to main content
added 80 characters in body; added 2 characters in body
Source Link
Chris S
  • 78.3k
  • 36
  • 72

You're welcome to leave your answer. If it offends the purpose of the site, we'll let you knowlet you know.

TechincallyTechnically your answer is 'more portable' and would be ever so slightly 'more correct' (if such an idea exists) as I see it. I'd probably just upvote both correct answers in the sort of case..

You're welcome to leave your answer. If it offends the purpose of the site, we'll let you know.

Techincally your answer is 'more portable' and would be ever so slightly 'more correct' (if such an idea exists).

You're welcome to leave your answer. If it offends the purpose of the site, we'll let you know.

Technically your answer is 'more portable' and would be ever so slightly 'more correct' (if such an idea exists) as I see it. I'd probably just upvote both correct answers in the sort of case..

deleted 2 characters in body
Source Link
EEAA
  • 110.2k
  • 28
  • 45

You're welcome to leave your answer. If it offends the purpose of the site, we'll let you know.

Techincally you'reyour answer is 'more portable' and would be ever so slightly 'more correct' (if such an idea exists).

You're welcome to leave your answer. If it offends the purpose of the site, we'll let you know.

Techincally you're answer is 'more portable' and would be ever so slightly 'more correct' (if such an idea exists).

You're welcome to leave your answer. If it offends the purpose of the site, we'll let you know.

Techincally your answer is 'more portable' and would be ever so slightly 'more correct' (if such an idea exists).

Source Link
Chris S
  • 78.3k
  • 36
  • 72

You're welcome to leave your answer. If it offends the purpose of the site, we'll let you know.

Techincally you're answer is 'more portable' and would be ever so slightly 'more correct' (if such an idea exists).