Timeline for Do we really need a backup-exec-2010 tag when there's a perfectly good backupexec tag?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 2011 at 2:23 | comment | added | Chris S | @growse, OT for this question but edits should bump the question so the community is aware of what users are doing. Users are highly discouraged from doing mass edits/retags like that, and even more so during the work week. Devs can mass retag without bumping; if that is needed for a tag post in mSF and they'll take care of it. Back OT, as Jeff suggests, unless one version is substantially different from another, it should not have a version tag. | |
| Jun 5, 2011 at 8:54 | comment | added | growse | I suspected as much. It seemed rather obvious with the entire front page of SF being filled with Backup Exec questions. Throwing this idea out there: would it make more sense to have only moderator/community-approved edits bump a topic to the top of the front page? | |
| Jun 5, 2011 at 8:50 | vote | accept | growse | ||
| Jun 5, 2011 at 4:28 | history | answered | Jeff Atwood | CC BY-SA 3.0 |