Timeline for Handling illegal/immoral questions and answers
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2011 at 14:51 | history | undeleted | dunxd | ||
| Jun 24, 2011 at 9:05 | history | deleted | dunxd | ||
| Jun 24, 2011 at 8:58 | history | edited | dunxd | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 139 characters in body; added 137 characters in body
|
| Jun 23, 2011 at 19:55 | comment | added | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | @John dunxd's point is that an attempt to get around a block of IPSEC is not intrinsically unethical or unprofessional. It's an attempt to get around a block of IPSEC, no more. As such, it should not be censored. | |
| Jun 23, 2011 at 0:35 | comment | added | John Gardeniers | I'm struggling to understand how you see an attempt to get around a block of IPSEC as anything but an attempt to get around a block of IPSEC, no matter how you word it. | |
| Jun 22, 2011 at 16:51 | history | answered | dunxd | CC BY-SA 3.0 |