Timeline for Cisco ASA tags (again)
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2011 at 11:21 | vote | accept | pauska | ||
| Jul 5, 2011 at 2:44 | comment | added | EEAA | I agree with John and Mark below - the PIX and ASA are separate product lines, with separate configuration syntax, capabilities, etc. They should stay separate. | |
| Jul 5, 2011 at 1:53 | answer | added | John Gardeniers | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jul 4, 2011 at 23:37 | comment | added | Mark Henderson Mod | Hopefully someone else will come along with an opinion ;) Otherwise if nobody has an opinion within a few days I'll make the merge. Honestly I don't think it's going to be an issue, becuase I don't think people really check their tags after creating their question. | |
| Jul 4, 2011 at 23:28 | comment | added | pauska | I admit, it's a gray zone.. Perhaps others can comment/discuss further on | |
| Jul 4, 2011 at 21:50 | answer | added | Mark HendersonMod | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jul 4, 2011 at 21:40 | comment | added | Mark Henderson Mod | Is PIX > ASA totally legit though? Because a PIX box has "Cisco PIX" written on the front of it, not "Cisco ASA" | |
| Jul 4, 2011 at 12:33 | history | asked | pauska | CC BY-SA 3.0 |