Timeline for Death to [newbie]!
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 17, 2017 at 10:13 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.serverfault.com/ with https://meta.serverfault.com/
|
|
Jul 24, 2011 at 4:11 | comment | added | Chris S | Also, if we have to do a mass retag for whatever reason, best to do them on the weekend and in small groups, when the site is pretty slow anyway and to push less questions off. | |
Jul 23, 2011 at 2:57 | answer | added | sysadmin1138Mod | timeline score: 1 | |
Jul 23, 2011 at 2:55 | comment | added | sysadmin1138 Mod | It's not all mod-hammer flailing around here. It takes a deft hand to knock those tags just right so everything falls into place. | |
Jul 23, 2011 at 2:21 | comment | added | womble Mod | You mods and your super-cow powers... | |
Jul 23, 2011 at 2:14 | comment | added | Mark Henderson Mod | If we do a normal update, it still trips it, but we also have other tools such as mass merges that we can do that don't trip it. | |
Jul 23, 2011 at 2:14 | comment | added | womble Mod | Moderator retags don't trip the 'updated' logic? I don't mind leaving it to mods (less work for me), but do you guys really want to have to do all of that? | |
Jul 23, 2011 at 2:08 | comment | added | Mark Henderson Mod |
Quick note, if you're going to retag more than say, 15-20, leave a note on meta so that one of us can retag where nessesary, because we don't raelly want the front page flooded with retags. When we had to retag vmware it took us about a week, but it meant that questions weren't getting pushed off the front page.
|
|
Jul 23, 2011 at 1:34 | history | asked | wombleMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |