Timeline for Flag declined - I don't understand the rationale behind why
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:14 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
|
|
| Aug 31, 2011 at 7:03 | vote | accept | artifex | ||
| Aug 31, 2011 at 7:03 | history | edited | artifex | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 88 characters in body
|
| Aug 30, 2011 at 12:55 | comment | added | Chris S | @Artifex, that's a common saying in the US regarding the law. Essentially it means that whoever currently has possesssion of something in question tends to have the law on their side regardless of proper ownership. In this case, I think Jeff meant it to mean whatever site already had the question should keep it (even if it's a mildly better fit for another site). | |
| Aug 29, 2011 at 22:52 | answer | added | John Gardeniers | timeline score: 2 | |
| Aug 29, 2011 at 14:59 | answer | added | Chopper3Mod | timeline score: 4 | |
| Aug 29, 2011 at 14:08 | comment | added | artifex | I'm not really familiar with that expression but i interpret it as, from what i've read, that if it isn't a clear case the moderation should stand as is? | |
| Aug 29, 2011 at 14:06 | answer | added | sysadmin1138Mod | timeline score: 5 | |
| Aug 29, 2011 at 13:03 | comment | added | Jeff Atwood | IMO that one is borderline, and "possession is 9/10ths of the law" | |
| Aug 29, 2011 at 12:30 | history | edited | artifex | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fixed grammar
|
| Aug 29, 2011 at 12:22 | history | asked | artifex | CC BY-SA 3.0 |