Skip to main content

Timeline for New TMG tags backwards?

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

5 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 8, 2011 at 2:02 comment added John Gardeniers I agree that it's far from obvious what TMG stands for (I thought it was a variant of TMNT). I'm sure those who do know what TMG is also already know who the vendor is. However, for those of us who don't know, does it really make any difference who the vendor is?
Sep 8, 2011 at 0:15 comment added TristanK See the titles at: social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/Forefrontedgegeneral/… for a quick overview of what people that use the product post about it as. I'm suggesting that for ease of use, better SEO, and simple populist rationalism, that SF adopt the most common acronym for the major tag. On other versions - an announcement is being awaited on the future of TMG, so perhaps not. On people calling anything forefront 2010 including antigen - it's an ambiguous tag, and should arguably just be removed (unless there's a gentle way of coaching people not to use an umbrella brand)
Sep 7, 2011 at 22:25 comment added Chris S re: a) There'll eventually be other versions of TMG, so TMG-2010 shouldn't be a synonym for TMG. There's only 3 tags, one for general TMG, one for TMG 2010, and one for Forefront (ie Antigen) products. b) Microsoft's website is littered with various acronyms. I agree that FTMG sounds weird, I didn't make it up. Your last sentence doesn't make sense. Could you restate it, or perhaps clearly & explicitly outline how you think the tags should be laid out?
Sep 7, 2011 at 21:24 comment added TristanK a) the synonymed tags should all route to the same product. They're currently just mildly renamed versions of each other. b) everyone that uses TMG calls it TMG, including the product group (see the ISA team blog). The second part doesn't matter as much as the suboptimal routing to different-yet-synonymous-but-not-synonymed end tags.
Sep 7, 2011 at 12:42 history answered Chris S CC BY-SA 3.0