Skip to main content
Server Fault

Return to Question

replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
Source Link
Community Bot
Community Bot
  • 1

I'm not a heavy Server Fault user, but it seems to me that it's growing a lot slower than other sites. The front page is often full of questions with hardly any upvotes, and I often find old questions without any answers.

I just found this meta postthis meta post from two years ago about this. Any updates? Is SF's traffic being diverted to Stack Exchange 2.0 sites?

I'm not a heavy Server Fault user, but it seems to me that it's growing a lot slower than other sites. The front page is often full of questions with hardly any upvotes, and I often find old questions without any answers.

I just found this meta post from two years ago about this. Any updates? Is SF's traffic being diverted to Stack Exchange 2.0 sites?

I'm not a heavy Server Fault user, but it seems to me that it's growing a lot slower than other sites. The front page is often full of questions with hardly any upvotes, and I often find old questions without any answers.

I just found this meta post from two years ago about this. Any updates? Is SF's traffic being diverted to Stack Exchange 2.0 sites?

Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
Source Link
Community Bot
Community Bot
  • 1

I'm not a heavy Server Fault user, but it seems to me that it's growing a lot slower than other sites. The front page is often full of questions with hardly any upvotes, and I often find old questions without any answers.

I just found this meta post from two years ago about this. Any updates? Is SF's traffic being diverted to Stack Exchange 2.0 sites?

I'm not a heavy Server Fault user, but it seems to me that it's growing a lot slower than other sites. The front page is often full of questions with hardly any upvotes, and I often find old questions without any answers.

I just found this meta post from two years ago about this. Any updates? Is SF's traffic being diverted to Stack Exchange 2.0 sites?

I'm not a heavy Server Fault user, but it seems to me that it's growing a lot slower than other sites. The front page is often full of questions with hardly any upvotes, and I often find old questions without any answers.

I just found this meta post from two years ago about this. Any updates? Is SF's traffic being diverted to Stack Exchange 2.0 sites?

Migration of MSO links to MSE links
Source Link
Community Bot
Community Bot
  • 1

I'm not a heavy Server Fault user, but it seems to me that it's growing a lot slower than other sites. The front page is often full of questions with hardly any upvotes, and I often find old questions without any answers.

I just found this meta postthis meta post from two years ago about this. Any updates? Is SF's traffic being diverted to Stack Exchange 2.0 sites?

I'm not a heavy Server Fault user, but it seems to me that it's growing a lot slower than other sites. The front page is often full of questions with hardly any upvotes, and I often find old questions without any answers.

I just found this meta post from two years ago about this. Any updates? Is SF's traffic being diverted to Stack Exchange 2.0 sites?

I'm not a heavy Server Fault user, but it seems to me that it's growing a lot slower than other sites. The front page is often full of questions with hardly any upvotes, and I often find old questions without any answers.

I just found this meta post from two years ago about this. Any updates? Is SF's traffic being diverted to Stack Exchange 2.0 sites?

Source Link
ripper234
ripper234
  • 6.1k
  • 15
  • 6