Timeline for How is Server Fault doing as of late 2011?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2011 at 9:43 | comment | added | user62491 | This pretty much sums up my opinion as well. I will add that as "entry-level" or "intermediate" admin there's not much incentive to answer the "entry-level" questions. No one views them, no one upvotes them (because they aren't interesting) and at least half of the time the OP never returns to either comment or mark an answer. it's really not worth the effort - there's no psychological reward because the community doesn't value the work and neither does the OP (or so it seems). | |
| Oct 31, 2011 at 22:37 | comment | added | Aaron | I try my best to go through and weed out the "this question will require playing 20 questions with the original poster" questions, as they not of the best use for this site. | |
| Oct 27, 2011 at 12:33 | comment | added | Chris S | It's not a sustained situation, it's cyclic. We're in a "ebb" right now, but in the next we months we'll "flow" again. There's no shortage of new users and Questions; it's the quality thereof that seems to change. | |
| Oct 27, 2011 at 11:41 | comment | added | ripper234 | I'd like to get a status update on this from someone in Stack Exchange LLC. It's a sustained situation that's not very healthy. | |
| Oct 27, 2011 at 11:21 | history | answered | pauska | CC BY-SA 3.0 |