Timeline for Can I Appeal "Not A Real Question"
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2011 at 21:20 | comment | added | Aaron Newton | Alright. I didn't think it was that confusing, but considering how many people did find it confusing I guess it was. As such, I don't actually agree with the comment you just made - at least 1 person was able to understand what I was asking give me a really good answer. But I'm not going to whinge any more as I at least agree with you in principle - I can see cases where I might have taken the same action (closure). | |
| Dec 5, 2011 at 18:22 | comment | added | Kara Marfia Mod | Zoredache was - I think - trying to limit the scope of the question; this is probably why it was closed. "Your questions should be reasonably scoped. If you can imagine an entire book that answers your question, you’re asking too much." -- maybe it's best in the future to try to whittle it down into one very distinct question, and break it into multiples if necessary. If you want the correct terminology, that's one question. | |
| Dec 5, 2011 at 5:19 | comment | added | Aaron Newton | Good feedback BUT no - this is not really a good representation of my question. That page answers part of my question, and this is why I am getting a bit frustrated (i.e. I got a -1 response when I don't think people have actually grasped what I'm asking here). My over-generalised statement is "Linux Paths" = NFS-like, "Windows Paths" = Y; Please define Y. As you can see this is a very specific questions about the underlying technology of an operating system. The answer provided gives good insight - serverfault.com/a/337438/24816 As you can see, this is a non-trivial question. | |
| Dec 5, 2011 at 4:37 | comment | added | Aaron Newton | To further strengthen my case, I have edited my question - serverfault.com/questions/337327/… | |
| Dec 5, 2011 at 1:44 | history | answered | Zoredache | CC BY-SA 3.0 |