Timeline for Inactive mods on SF - Or are they?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2011 at 2:49 | comment | added | Shane Madden | @JohnGardeniers Absolutely - the minute it gets tied to a mandatory level of activity for whatever metric, something has gone horribly wrong. I think our discussion has been (and should be) more around those who have simply lost interest in the community. | |
| Dec 14, 2011 at 2:05 | comment | added | John Gardeniers | The problem with REQUIRING a certain level of activity is that it doesn't allow for the fact that the time the mods put in is their own and they each have lives (at least in the sense that sysadmins have lives). It's not like a paid occupation, where it is reasonable to require a level of activity. | |
| Dec 13, 2011 at 18:30 | comment | added | Michael Mrozek | You're thinking of the post where Jeff criticized some SO mods for spending too much time posting answers when they should be handling flags -- essentially the opposite of this question, which is why I found it rather funny when I saw it | |
| Dec 13, 2011 at 17:18 | history | answered | Shane Madden | CC BY-SA 3.0 |