Skip to main content
Server Fault

Return to Question

replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
Source Link
Community Bot
Community Bot
  • 1

(EDIT: changed the request based on Eric's answer)

To align to the convention we've created on SF.

12 questions currently tagged with [windows2000server]

15 tagged with [windows-2000-server]

Thanks!

BTW- I agree with hyperslug that a dozen bumps from me doing this manually is a bit noisy on the front page... I can do it, though, if nobody wants to. (see this answer from earliersee this answer from earlier)

(EDIT: changed the request based on Eric's answer)

To align to the convention we've created on SF.

12 questions currently tagged with [windows2000server]

15 tagged with [windows-2000-server]

Thanks!

BTW- I agree with hyperslug that a dozen bumps from me doing this manually is a bit noisy on the front page... I can do it, though, if nobody wants to. (see this answer from earlier)

(EDIT: changed the request based on Eric's answer)

To align to the convention we've created on SF.

12 questions currently tagged with [windows2000server]

15 tagged with [windows-2000-server]

Thanks!

BTW- I agree with hyperslug that a dozen bumps from me doing this manually is a bit noisy on the front page... I can do it, though, if nobody wants to. (see this answer from earlier)

Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
Source Link
Community Bot
Community Bot
  • 1

(EDIT: changed the request based on Eric's answer)

To align to the convention we've created on SF.

12 questions currently tagged with [windows2000server]

15 tagged with [windows-2000-server]

Thanks!

BTW- I agree with hyperslug that a dozen bumps from me doing this manually is a bit noisy on the front page... I can do it, though, if nobody wants to. (see this answer from earlier)

(EDIT: changed the request based on Eric's answer)

To align to the convention we've created on SF.

12 questions currently tagged with [windows2000server]

15 tagged with [windows-2000-server]

Thanks!

BTW- I agree with hyperslug that a dozen bumps from me doing this manually is a bit noisy on the front page... I can do it, though, if nobody wants to. (see this answer from earlier)

(EDIT: changed the request based on Eric's answer)

To align to the convention we've created on SF.

12 questions currently tagged with [windows2000server]

15 tagged with [windows-2000-server]

Thanks!

BTW- I agree with hyperslug that a dozen bumps from me doing this manually is a bit noisy on the front page... I can do it, though, if nobody wants to. (see this answer from earlier)

Migration of MSO links to MSE links
Source Link
Community Bot
Community Bot
  • 1

(EDIT: changed the request based on Eric's answer)

To align to the convention we've created on SF.

12 questions currently tagged with [windows2000server]

15 tagged with [windows-2000-server]

Thanks!

BTW- I agree with hyperslug that a dozen bumps from me doing this manually is a bit noisy on the front page... I can do it, though, if nobody wants to. (see this answer from earliersee this answer from earlier)

(EDIT: changed the request based on Eric's answer)

To align to the convention we've created on SF.

12 questions currently tagged with [windows2000server]

15 tagged with [windows-2000-server]

Thanks!

BTW- I agree with hyperslug that a dozen bumps from me doing this manually is a bit noisy on the front page... I can do it, though, if nobody wants to. (see this answer from earlier)

(EDIT: changed the request based on Eric's answer)

To align to the convention we've created on SF.

12 questions currently tagged with [windows2000server]

15 tagged with [windows-2000-server]

Thanks!

BTW- I agree with hyperslug that a dozen bumps from me doing this manually is a bit noisy on the front page... I can do it, though, if nobody wants to. (see this answer from earlier)

Post Migrated Here from meta.stackexchange.com (revisions)
Source Link
squillman
squillman