Timeline for Should you really be asked to particpate in the moderator election when you don't have sufficent reputation to vote
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2015 at 17:36 | history | edited | Geoff Dalgas |
edited tags
|
|
| Jan 18, 2012 at 9:22 | comment | added | scarba05 | Yes I got the 100 bonus but then I added a bounty to a question a while back and dropped back. My point is not that I think the bar is too high for voting or that I desperately want to vote, rather that it was annoying to only discover the fact after reading through the whole of the election page. | |
| Jan 17, 2012 at 15:41 | history | edited | voretaq7 |
This should probably have the generic election tag too :)
|
|
| Jan 17, 2012 at 13:41 | comment | added | Chris S | @Iain They're already linked, but he can break the link and relink them to claim the 100. | |
| Jan 17, 2012 at 11:10 | answer | added | user9517 | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jan 17, 2012 at 10:30 | comment | added | user9517 | If you linked your SO account to your SF account you'd get a bonus 100 rep which may count towards the rep requirement to vote. | |
| Jan 17, 2012 at 10:14 | vote | accept | scarba05 | ||
| Jan 17, 2012 at 10:11 | history | edited | Mark HendersonMod |
edited tags; edited tags
|
|
| Jan 17, 2012 at 10:11 | answer | added | Mark HendersonMod | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jan 17, 2012 at 9:50 | history | asked | scarba05 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |