Timeline for What's wrong with ServerFault community?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2012 at 14:09 | comment | added | Chris S | If a question is crap, it should be closed, immediately. If the user wants to edit it, it can easily be reopened. If the user would simply prefer to start over they can submit a new question. It's not like we're banning the user for a single bad question. | |
| Jan 24, 2012 at 13:45 | history | edited | MDMarra | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Jan 24, 2012 at 12:52 | comment | added | Stefano |
The I disagree that someone should be given a chance to "fix" their bad question before its closed would apply both to my Solaris question and to the HAproxy question. I totally understand your point of view, though I feel that at least newbies should be given a chance with their first questions. But I am understanding the big difference between SF and SO from all you guy answers, and it make sense, as long is it made (even more) clear in the FAQ. About Solaris, I'm updating my question a little to make my point clearer! Oh and thanks for the upvote :)
|
|
| Jan 24, 2012 at 12:27 | history | answered | MDMarra | CC BY-SA 3.0 |