Timeline for I would like to reopen this question
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:14 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
|
|
| Jan 26, 2012 at 17:29 | comment | added | mit | It is not the goal of needing more than one vote for closing that they just klick without reading., The goal is that they check by themselves and if they do it cannot happen so easily that such an obvious mistake happens. | |
| Jan 26, 2012 at 17:28 | comment | added | mit | Answsering youre No 2: it is obvious to someone who reads it that it is not a duplicate, it is a different question and if you read the first version you can see that. The one who should explain was the person who in the beginning marked this as a duplicate. Although I could understand that one person makes a mistake, I cannot understand that 3 others followed him, this can only mean they juwst like to klick around and do not really read the underlying case, they just trusted in the first persons (the one who voted duplicate first) opinion. But this is misuse of their admin position. | |
| Jan 26, 2012 at 2:37 | history | migrated | from meta.stackexchange.com (revisions) | ||
| Jan 25, 2012 at 22:17 | history | answered | slhck | CC BY-SA 3.0 |