Timeline for Can't vote again if previous vote has expired?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:32 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 13:35 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 9:11 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| Jan 30, 2012 at 20:56 | comment | added | John Gardeniers | Yet another reason programmers should not be allowed to design user interfaces. Among other things it ignores the fact that sometimes peoples' hands shake (tends to happen more as you get older), which can result in multiple presses of a key or button, which may not even be noticed immediately if you're not looking at the screen. | |
| Jan 30, 2012 at 19:44 | comment | added | voretaq7 Mod | The logic is almost sound for upvotes/downvotes on questions (you "voted" in that you decided this was/was not worthy of the up or downvote you were going to apply), but I agree with @syneticon-dj that you should be allowed to re-apply a close vote to a question if it expires: You still want to close it, so why shouldn't you be allowed to pile on if your vote expired but 4 other people decided they wanted to close it too? | |
| Jan 30, 2012 at 13:05 | comment | added | the-wabbit | Sounds broken to me. Logically, both, canceling up/downvotes and deleting / expiring close and delete votes should reinstate the voting status to what it would have been without these votes. | |
| Jan 30, 2012 at 10:12 | history | answered | Ward - Trying CodidactMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |