Timeline for There are 189 questions tagged [belongs-on-superuser] on Server Fault
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
27 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 23, 2017 at 12:39 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:14 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
|
|
Mar 20, 2017 at 10:18 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
|
|
Feb 6, 2012 at 9:43 | vote | accept | ChrisF | ||
Feb 6, 2012 at 9:42 | vote | accept | ChrisF | ||
Feb 6, 2012 at 9:43 | |||||
Aug 3, 2010 at 3:31 | history | edited | Jeff Atwood |
edited tags
|
|
Jul 29, 2010 at 19:58 | answer | added | ChrisF | timeline score: 1 | |
Jul 22, 2010 at 18:07 | history | migrated | from meta.stackexchange.com (revisions) | ||
Jun 9, 2010 at 9:59 | comment | added | ChrisF | @Zoredache - When the quick tag editing was introduced you could edit the tags on closed questions, which is how I was able to remove the tags from Stack Overflow. I couldn't do Server Fault as I don't have enough rep. However, that feature was removed so now only very few people can remove those tags now. | |
Jun 9, 2010 at 9:57 | comment | added | ChrisF | @DouglasDD - yes it's normal that answers are deleted from the original question. | |
Jun 8, 2010 at 6:56 | comment | added | Zoredache | It is unfortunate that I cannot do anything to clean up serverfault given that the vast majority of these questions are closed. | |
Jun 8, 2010 at 5:25 | comment | added | DouglasDD | When a question is moved from stack overflow to server fault, is it normal that the associated answers are marked as deleted? Or was that only because (at the time) I had only ever logged in to stack overflow, never to server fault? | |
Apr 8, 2010 at 3:21 | comment | added | Jeff Atwood | excellent, thanks for cleaning this up! | |
Apr 7, 2010 at 17:30 | comment | added | Pollyanna | I got 407 problems, but a tag ain't one. | |
Jan 31, 2010 at 3:18 | comment | added | Joel Potter | Yesterday and today someone went in and tagged some questions belongs-on-doctype. This tag is even more abominable in my opinion because questions cannot be migrated to doctype, nor is there a clear line between what's acceptable on SO and what belongs on doctype. | |
Dec 28, 2009 at 15:30 | comment | added | GmonC | @bmargulies: I had the same problem. I've seen this "belongs-to-*" and since I don't regularly reads all meta feature requests/modifications I didn't know it's being "deprecated". I would like to have an "Advanced FAQ" that can address all these hidden rules of SO. I thought I was just being good for the community and now people say it's evil. | |
Nov 21, 2009 at 20:42 | comment | added | ChrisF | @bmargulies - it's one of the "unwritten" rules rather than being something in the faq for example. It's come up here on meta quite a few times. The problem is that these tags are just noise especially when they get left on questions that have been migrated. | |
Nov 21, 2009 at 19:03 | comment | added | Rosinante | Um, I'm completely stunned to learn that belongs-on* is evil. I saw them, and when I got points to retag, I started to use them, and I've never seen anything to indicate that I was trangressing. More propaganda needed? | |
Nov 19, 2009 at 22:56 | comment | added | mmyers | Noooo! stackoverflow.com/questions/1765365/… got migrated to SU with the tag intact, so unless a moderator sees and has mercy we're stuck with a permanent belongs-on-superuser question. | |
Nov 19, 2009 at 10:08 | comment | added | Unknown Yahoo | There are no "belongs-on-superuser" questions on stack overflow because everyone on stack overflow appears to punt anything that doesn't belong there to serverfault, even if it's obviously a superuser question... | |
Nov 18, 2009 at 21:57 | answer | added | Lance Roberts | timeline score: 1 | |
Nov 18, 2009 at 21:55 | answer | added | Dr. Gonzo | timeline score: 8 | |
Nov 18, 2009 at 21:50 | comment | added | Troggy | Yes, ignore my question mark. Look, a badger! | |
Nov 18, 2009 at 21:49 | comment | added | Ladybug Killer | Troggy, these tags are the reason why this list was suggested. | |
Nov 18, 2009 at 21:47 | comment | added | ChrisF | @Troggy - indeed they would. | |
Nov 18, 2009 at 21:45 | comment | added | Troggy | Would those tags be candidates for the planned tag black list? meta.stackexchange.com/questions/19018/… | |
Nov 18, 2009 at 21:41 | history | asked | ChrisF | CC BY-SA 2.5 |