Skip to main content
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
Source Link

The m.SO question posted by Mark is from July of last year; in October of last year, a number of SO's "hidden features" questions were closed and locked - and even as recently as a week ago, the one for Pythonone for Python was (re)closed.

The majority of their "big" hidden features questionshidden features questions seem to be closed and/or locked, but some are not; it doesn't seem to be quite a settled debate.

But, hey: we're not Stack Overflow, and I think we can make this one idiosyncrasy that we choose not to inherit.

The m.SO question posted by Mark is from July of last year; in October of last year, a number of SO's "hidden features" questions were closed and locked - and even as recently as a week ago, the one for Python was (re)closed.

The majority of their "big" hidden features questions seem to be closed and/or locked, but some are not; it doesn't seem to be quite a settled debate.

But, hey: we're not Stack Overflow, and I think we can make this one idiosyncrasy that we choose not to inherit.

The m.SO question posted by Mark is from July of last year; in October of last year, a number of SO's "hidden features" questions were closed and locked - and even as recently as a week ago, the one for Python was (re)closed.

The majority of their "big" hidden features questions seem to be closed and/or locked, but some are not; it doesn't seem to be quite a settled debate.

But, hey: we're not Stack Overflow, and I think we can make this one idiosyncrasy that we choose not to inherit.

replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

The m.SO questionm.SO question posted by Mark is from July of last year; in October of last year, a number of SO's "hidden features" questions were closed and locked - and even as recently as a week ago, the one for Python was (re)closed.

The majority of their "big" hidden features questions seem to be closed and/or locked, but some are not; it doesn't seem to be quite a settled debate.

But, hey: we're not Stack Overflow, and I think we can make this one idiosyncrasy that we choose not to inherit.

The m.SO question posted by Mark is from July of last year; in October of last year, a number of SO's "hidden features" questions were closed and locked - and even as recently as a week ago, the one for Python was (re)closed.

The majority of their "big" hidden features questions seem to be closed and/or locked, but some are not; it doesn't seem to be quite a settled debate.

But, hey: we're not Stack Overflow, and I think we can make this one idiosyncrasy that we choose not to inherit.

The m.SO question posted by Mark is from July of last year; in October of last year, a number of SO's "hidden features" questions were closed and locked - and even as recently as a week ago, the one for Python was (re)closed.

The majority of their "big" hidden features questions seem to be closed and/or locked, but some are not; it doesn't seem to be quite a settled debate.

But, hey: we're not Stack Overflow, and I think we can make this one idiosyncrasy that we choose not to inherit.

Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
Source Link

The m.SO question posted by Mark is from July of last year; in October of last year, a number of SO's "hidden features""hidden features" questions were closed and locked - and even as recently as a week ago, the one for Python was (re)closed.

The majority of their "big""big" hidden features questions seem to be closed and/or locked, but some are not; it doesn't seem to be quite a settled debate.

But, hey: we're not Stack Overflow, and I think we can make this one idiosyncrasy that we choose not to inherit.

The m.SO question posted by Mark is from July of last year; in October of last year, a number of SO's "hidden features" questions were closed and locked - and even as recently as a week ago, the one for Python was (re)closed.

The majority of their "big" hidden features questions seem to be closed and/or locked, but some are not; it doesn't seem to be quite a settled debate.

But, hey: we're not Stack Overflow, and I think we can make this one idiosyncrasy that we choose not to inherit.

The m.SO question posted by Mark is from July of last year; in October of last year, a number of SO's "hidden features" questions were closed and locked - and even as recently as a week ago, the one for Python was (re)closed.

The majority of their "big" hidden features questions seem to be closed and/or locked, but some are not; it doesn't seem to be quite a settled debate.

But, hey: we're not Stack Overflow, and I think we can make this one idiosyncrasy that we choose not to inherit.

Migration of MSO links to MSE links
Source Link
Loading
Source Link
Shane Madden
  • 115.9k
  • 17
  • 31
Loading