Skip to main content
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
Source Link

I just had a question closed on Server Fault: Open Source Monitoring for WindowsOpen Source Monitoring for Windows

However, I can't understand why.

The FAQFAQ states that questions about monitoring (which it is) are allowed. I guess at a casual glance it might appear to be a shopping question, but it is not. It's a question about whether there are any solutions, at all, that meet the given criteria.

Did I misunderstand something about acceptable questions?

I just had a question closed on Server Fault: Open Source Monitoring for Windows

However, I can't understand why.

The FAQ states that questions about monitoring (which it is) are allowed. I guess at a casual glance it might appear to be a shopping question, but it is not. It's a question about whether there are any solutions, at all, that meet the given criteria.

Did I misunderstand something about acceptable questions?

I just had a question closed on Server Fault: Open Source Monitoring for Windows

However, I can't understand why.

The FAQ states that questions about monitoring (which it is) are allowed. I guess at a casual glance it might appear to be a shopping question, but it is not. It's a question about whether there are any solutions, at all, that meet the given criteria.

Did I misunderstand something about acceptable questions?

Post Migrated Here from meta.stackexchange.com (revisions)
Source Link
Eric J.
  • 762
  • 3
  • 2

Why was my question considered not acceptable for Server Fault?

I just had a question closed on Server Fault: Open Source Monitoring for Windows

However, I can't understand why.

The FAQ states that questions about monitoring (which it is) are allowed. I guess at a casual glance it might appear to be a shopping question, but it is not. It's a question about whether there are any solutions, at all, that meet the given criteria.

Did I misunderstand something about acceptable questions?