Timeline for Where to ask complex but home network questions?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2012 at 19:35 | comment | added | Chris S Mod | Eh, that's not "home equipment" as we define it... We've had this discussion before (can't find the link right now), but don't get too caught up on the word "home". The location of the equipment and the fact (in this case) that it's carrying data for a "home user" doesn't detract from the ISP's business use of the technology. The other discussion I can't find the link for was regarding a telecommuter, he was working in a 100% business capacity. The fact that his "office" is collocated with his domiciliary habitation doesn't make it a "home" question. | |
| Apr 26, 2012 at 9:38 | comment | added | Richard Gadsden | Nope, but it's home equipment, which some people were arguing was off-topic. | |
| Apr 25, 2012 at 21:43 | comment | added | John Gardeniers | Then it's not really home networking, is it? In that context the question does indeed belong on SF. This is really no different to how many of us need to deal with remote users of our corporate networks. | |
| Apr 25, 2012 at 11:51 | history | answered | Richard Gadsden | CC BY-SA 3.0 |