Timeline for Confused about some question migrations?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2012 at 22:14 | comment | added | EightBitTony | On a purely personal level after having spent a while reading through a lot of questions, I think there is a lot of inconsistency in the way the FAQ is applied by voters. I appreciate there's not much that can be done, because people are people, but it irks me (I like consistency, and I like things to make sense). Lots of posts with 'interesting' questions that don't look like professional queries seem to survive, but boring border-line ones get voted off. | |
| May 21, 2012 at 22:12 | vote | accept | EightBitTony | ||
| May 21, 2012 at 11:08 | comment | added | John Gardeniers | +1 It really does depend on who sees the question. e.g. I'm usually pretty quick on the voting button but the vim question is a topic I know noting about, so would never even view it. The subject doesn't attract my attention as possibly off topic because syntax highlighting is important to me, both as an admin and as a code cutter. | |
| May 20, 2012 at 19:23 | comment | added | EightBitTony | The original question was answered pretty quickly as well. I don't say this just to be argumentative, but to try and understand. Anyway, thanks for the responses. | |
| May 20, 2012 at 13:09 | comment | added | Chris S Mod | +1 for "Because of the speed, our usual close-voters missed it since they tend to ignore accepted questions unless there is something in the subject to warrant suspicion." | |
| May 20, 2012 at 12:56 | history | answered | sysadmin1138Mod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |