Timeline for Should questions that are sysadmin-relevant but not sysadmin-specific be closed as Off Topic?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 5, 2012 at 17:15 | history | edited | Skyhawk | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 characters in body
|
Jun 3, 2012 at 21:56 | comment | added | Rory Alsop | IT security has a very different scope than System administration, in fact it is a lot wider than IT Security - we also encompass a lot of other security aspects a security professional will be likely to deal with, including social engineering, forensics, physical security, CCTV etc. | |
May 31, 2012 at 20:06 | comment | added | Kyle Brandt | My understanding is that IT Security is a different field than System administration. There is overlap but they are different. My take is that when there is overlap (it would be fine on either site, both sites have people capable of answering it) then leave it on the site it was asked on. | |
May 31, 2012 at 19:54 | comment | added | Ward - Trying Codidact Mod | IT Security, for one. | |
May 31, 2012 at 19:53 | comment | added | Kyle Brandt | @ChrisS: Rather try to answer that in more concrete terms. Which sites in particular? | |
May 31, 2012 at 19:51 | comment | added | Chris S Mod | If system administration as defined for Server Fault is so expansive why are there so many Stack Exchange sites dedicated to the minute tasks we would normally consider "system administration"? | |
May 31, 2012 at 19:45 | history | answered | Kyle Brandt | CC BY-SA 3.0 |