Timeline for question list color coding on serverfault is hard to read
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2013 at 13:28 | comment | added | mveroone | Why doing differently on other sites sur as SU where accepter answer radically change the aspect (heavy green background on the square with white-ish characters) ? It's much more readable there =( | |
| Jul 22, 2010 at 18:07 | history | migrated | from meta.stackexchange.com (revisions) | ||
| Jan 13, 2010 at 15:25 | comment | added | Jon Seigel | No argument there. I think I may have mis-stated -- it was probably less a by-design decision and more a by-designer decision. ;) | |
| Jan 13, 2010 at 14:40 | comment | added | Peter Eisentraut | I had initially suspected the same as your second point, that people should still participate in already answered questions. But note that on Stack Overflow and Super User the distinction between not answered and answered questions is very much in your face, almost the most noticeable element on the page. | |
| Jan 9, 2010 at 21:47 | history | answered | Jon Seigel | CC BY-SA 2.5 |