Timeline for What happened to the "Read the FAQ" banner?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:32 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 13:35 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 9:11 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| Aug 13, 2012 at 19:59 | comment | added | John Gardeniers | Base on that it would appear that we may as well not have an FAQ and all the effort that went into editing it was for nothing. | |
| Aug 13, 2012 at 15:49 | comment | added | user9517 Mod |
From a recent blog post. Tired of seeing crappy questions? Close them. Irritated by lousy answers? Down-vote them. Depressed by the meaningless junk that some people post whenever they see an empty text field? Delete it! Embarrassed by poor grammar or formatting? Edit it! See someone being rude? Flag it!
|
|
| Aug 13, 2012 at 14:46 | comment | added | John Gardeniers | And we, or at least some of us, want to do the opposite. I'd hate to see SF get as pathetically sloppy as SO is. | |
| Aug 13, 2012 at 11:26 | comment | added | user9517 Mod | I can't find the reference now but my understanding is that the team want to discourage slapping people in the face with the faq. | |
| Aug 13, 2012 at 9:47 | comment | added | John Gardeniers | Pity in a way. Low usage or not, at least we had more of an argument in telling people to read the FAQ. It's one thing to not do it. It's something else altogether for people to blatantly ignore a big banner telling them to do so. | |
| Aug 13, 2012 at 9:44 | vote | accept | John Gardeniers | ||
| Aug 13, 2012 at 7:03 | history | answered | user9517Mod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |