Timeline for Question about optimizing compilers for a server was closed although it precisely fits SF's scope
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2012 at 9:47 | comment | added | John Gardeniers | @jstarek, allowing a sysadmin to choose dev tools is just as stupid as allowing devs to dictate how to configure a server. The two should stick to their own fields. Some of us are both but we probably understand better than most why it should be that way. | |
| Aug 29, 2012 at 18:28 | history | edited | Michael Hampton | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Simple typo
|
| Aug 29, 2012 at 10:30 | comment | added | jstarek | Thanks for this explanation, this clarifies it a bit for me. I still don't quite see why this would be considered a "product recommendation", as you state in your comment below the original question, but I see how this misunderstanding of the FAQ was caused: In the environment I work in, it is the sysadmins who choose and install the compilers that the system's users then use to compile their HPC jobs. | |
| Aug 29, 2012 at 10:09 | history | answered | user9517Mod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |