Timeline for Is SF an appropriate place to ask any question about telco network?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 4, 2012 at 22:06 | comment | added | Alexander Janssen | Would it help if I compile a list of usecases to proof my claims? I don't want to troll around, start a flamewar or make people angry. I just feel that this is the right place. Networking professionals. A lot of people might be into it. | |
Oct 4, 2012 at 22:00 | comment | added | Alexander Janssen | The telco business changed a lot in recent years. SS7 isn't not only transported exclusively via PCM30 any more, but via SIGTRAN, which is transported via SCTP, which is an IP-level protocol. Does that make it valid? And looking into the GTP-U protocol, which transports user-plane IP-traffic from the Radio Access Network to the GGSN - if that's not IP-networking, then I don't know. | |
Oct 4, 2012 at 21:53 | comment | added | John Gardeniers | Taken on its own that sentence from the FAQ almost looks like telco questions would be on topic but things change when you read that same sentence in context with the rest of that section. | |
Oct 4, 2012 at 21:39 | comment | added | Alexander Janssen | Yes, I read it. "Network routing, switches, and firewalls". OK. It's not specifically related to telecommunication networks. But anyway, I just figured out that meta.SF is not something I'd like to spend too much time into. I just take the chance trying to give useful answers in the case something about telecommunication pops up, taking the risk to be downvoted. | |
Oct 4, 2012 at 21:31 | comment | added | John Gardeniers | The part where it describes what kind of questions are on topic for SF. | |
Oct 4, 2012 at 18:31 | comment | added | Alexander Janssen | Yes, I did. So, what did I miss then? | |
Oct 4, 2012 at 7:34 | comment | added | John Gardeniers | Have you even read the FAQ? | |
Oct 3, 2012 at 23:09 | history | answered | Alexander Janssen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |