Timeline for Can the tags x and x11 be merged?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2012 at 22:22 | comment | added | Michael Hampton | None of the 42 had anything to do with X11 on Mac OS X. | |
| Oct 22, 2012 at 22:22 | comment | added | John Gardeniers | "None of the 42 had anything to do with X11" sounds to me like a good argument for not merging X and X11. | |
| Oct 22, 2012 at 13:21 | comment | added | Michael Hampton | What are you talking about? | |
| Oct 22, 2012 at 7:45 | comment | added | John Gardeniers | Maybe you've just presented your own case for not merging the two tags. | |
| Oct 22, 2012 at 2:43 | comment | added | Michael Hampton | 8 of 42 questions tagged x actually referred to macosx. They have all been dealt with. None of the 42 had anything to do with X11 on Mac OS X. | |
| Oct 22, 2012 at 2:40 | comment | added | John Gardeniers | That was just one example that popped into my head. It's just that I see X11 as being the more valid case that just X, because it's much more obvious what it's referring to. | |
| Oct 22, 2012 at 2:36 | comment | added | Michael Hampton | The questions tagged x which refer to macosx seem to be in the minority, from a quick look. | |
| Oct 22, 2012 at 2:34 | history | answered | John Gardeniers | CC BY-SA 3.0 |