Timeline for Go forth and review please
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:14 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
|
|
| Oct 24, 2012 at 21:00 | comment | added | user9517 Mod | My mSO-Fu is weak. I asked in TL and apparently 3 normal or 1 mod DNC vote will remove it from the queue and start the close votes ageing immediately (rather than requiring 100 views?). I see this in both the links you provide because I can't use the review queue to vote I only have a next button. | |
| Oct 24, 2012 at 20:44 | comment | added | sysadmin1138 Mod | However, the few cases I can see of double-mod no-closes are all very close together so there may be a timing component involved. The vast majority of mod-actions are the final actions. | |
| Oct 24, 2012 at 20:39 | comment | added | sysadmin1138 Mod | @Iain Having watched for that exact behavior, I'm very sure that a mod no-close has no effect on any in-place close-votes. And this review has two mods voting no-close. | |
| Oct 24, 2012 at 20:37 | comment | added | user9517 Mod | 5 (I think ) normal or one moderator Do Not Close will remove all close votes and then remove the question from the close queue. | |
| Oct 24, 2012 at 20:30 | history | answered | sysadmin1138Mod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |