There has been some disquiet and discussiondisquiet and discussion recently about the number of poor inbound migrations to Serverfault.
One suggestionOne suggestion is that our subtitle
Q&A for system administrators and desktop support professionals
doesn't convey the scope of serverfault well.
How can we improve the subtitle that is seen on the close->Off Topic dialogue to better convey the scope of Serverfault ?
There has been some disquiet and discussion recently about the number of poor inbound migrations to Serverfault.
One suggestion is that our subtitle
Q&A for system administrators and desktop support professionals
doesn't convey the scope of serverfault well.
How can we improve the subtitle that is seen on the close->Off Topic dialogue to better convey the scope of Serverfault ?
There has been some disquiet and discussion recently about the number of poor inbound migrations to Serverfault.
One suggestion is that our subtitle
Q&A for system administrators and desktop support professionals
doesn't convey the scope of serverfault well.
How can we improve the subtitle that is seen on the close->Off Topic dialogue to better convey the scope of Serverfault ?
There has been some disquiet and discussion recently about the number of poor inbound migrations to Serverfault.
One suggestion is that our subtitle
Q&A for system administrators and desktop support professionals
doesn't convey the scope of serverfault well.
How can we improve the subtitle that is seen on the close->Off>Off Topic dialogue to better convey the scope of Serverfault ?
There has been some disquiet and discussion recently about the number of poor inbound migrations to Serverfault.
One suggestion is that our subtitle
Q&A for system administrators and desktop support professionals
doesn't convey the scope of serverfault well.
How can we improve the subtitle that is seen on the close->Off Topic dialogue to better convey the scope of Serverfault ?
There has been some disquiet and discussion recently about the number of poor inbound migrations to Serverfault.
One suggestion is that our subtitle
Q&A for system administrators and desktop support professionals
doesn't convey the scope of serverfault well.
How can we improve the subtitle that is seen on the close->Off Topic dialogue to better convey the scope of Serverfault ?
There has been some disquiet and discussiondisquiet and discussion recently about the number of poor inbound migrations to Serverfault.
One suggestionOne suggestion is that our subtitle
Q&A for system administrators and desktop support professionals
doesn't convey the scope of serverfault well.
How can we improve the subtitle that is seen on the close->Off>Off Topic dialogue to better convey the scope of Serverfault ?
There has been some disquiet and discussion recently about the number of poor inbound migrations to Serverfault.
One suggestion is that our subtitle
Q&A for system administrators and desktop support professionals
doesn't convey the scope of serverfault well.
How can we improve the subtitle that is seen on the close->Off Topic dialogue to better convey the scope of Serverfault ?
There has been some disquiet and discussion recently about the number of poor inbound migrations to Serverfault.
One suggestion is that our subtitle
Q&A for system administrators and desktop support professionals
doesn't convey the scope of serverfault well.
How can we improve the subtitle that is seen on the close->Off Topic dialogue to better convey the scope of Serverfault ?
