Timeline for Users with editing privileges can no longer approve edits
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2012 at 3:22 | comment | added | John Gardeniers | @Chris, I disagree (with the first sentence only). By punishing the perpetrators we would in fact be dealing with the disease. | |
| Oct 31, 2012 at 13:16 | comment | added | Chris S Mod | @JohnGardeniers Your proposed punishment system is a reaction to the symptoms, it's still not a "solution to the problem". The problem is that we're dealing with the Public. Unless you want to make SE a closed community you're never going to change the fact that half of users are below average intelligence/responsibility/respect... | |
| Oct 31, 2012 at 6:53 | comment | added | John Gardeniers | Thanks for the explanation, even though it looks like another case of treating the symptoms instead of the disease. Perhaps there could instead be a penalty system for bad edits that get rolled back. Say 5% of the approver's rep. That might make people a little more careful. | |
| Oct 31, 2012 at 5:23 | comment | added | Shane Madden | Fair enough - thanks for helping us understand the reasoning behind the change! | |
| Oct 31, 2012 at 4:40 | history | edited | Shog9 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 367 characters in body
|
| Oct 31, 2012 at 4:34 | history | answered | Shog9 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |