Timeline for Are questions about home server somehow inherently off-topic? If so, why?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:14 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
|
|
Dec 9, 2012 at 23:45 | comment | added | Zoredache | @KentFredric If the 'home' setting of your question is irrelevant, don't bring it up then. If your question is on-topic for the the site aside from that detail. If the question cannot be asked without bring up that this is for home-use then the question is off-topic. Or if the person who asked the question balks at the answers saying they don't apply because this is a home-use setting or that they are not a professional, then the question is off-topic. The home-use rule is just a way to weed out people who want a half-assed solution. | |
Dec 9, 2012 at 21:23 | comment | added | Kent Fredric | I mean, there are only 4 people behind my router, ... but I've also worked in businesses where there could easily be only 4 people behind the router, and they just use shitty commodity hardware for that. So my "Home Network" could be considered more "professional" than many "Professional enterprises" =p | |
Dec 9, 2012 at 21:19 | comment | added | Kent Fredric | I have personal issue with this rationale, because I do things frequently in a home network environment that I might also be inclined to do in a small corporate network, ie: setting up a BSD Router w/ DHCP / NAT / DNS / IPv6 / Mail , etc, and it really is my "learning" platform so I know how to do that before I try do it in a paid capacity. So for me, "Home setting" is very, very vague. | |
Dec 8, 2012 at 21:10 | history | edited | user9517Mod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 460 characters in body
|
Dec 8, 2012 at 20:47 | history | answered | user9517Mod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |