Timeline for Can reputations ever go negative?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:32 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 13:35 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 9:11 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| Dec 28, 2012 at 9:12 | comment | added | user9517 Mod | @SharenEayrs: Everyone who is working as a professional sysadmin should have some skills which would allow them to answer some questions and get themselves out of a question ban. | |
| Dec 27, 2012 at 12:27 | comment | added | user4234 | People with poor start can't even ask questions anymore and don't know enough to answer anything. | |
| Dec 22, 2012 at 14:06 | comment | added | Skyhawk | Considering that it takes five downvotes to counter the reputation effect of a single answer upvote, I'd figure that anyone at risk of negative rep most likely deserves it. | |
| Dec 18, 2012 at 21:02 | vote | accept | mdpc | ||
| Dec 18, 2012 at 21:01 | comment | added | voretaq7 Mod | Interestingly the FAQ doesn't seem to cover this, but yes - No matter how much of a git someone is (even to the point of a moderator suspending them) an account will never have reputation less than 1. | |
| Dec 18, 2012 at 21:00 | history | answered | user9517Mod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |