Timeline for Should we have a "general reference" close reason?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:14 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
|
|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 10:13 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.serverfault.com/ with https://meta.serverfault.com/
|
|
| Oct 21, 2014 at 13:03 | history | edited | user9517 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 34 characters in body
|
| Oct 21, 2014 at 7:38 | history | edited | user9517 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
People just don't read anything
|
| Oct 21, 2014 at 6:04 | history | edited | user9517 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 41 characters in body
|
| Oct 20, 2014 at 23:52 | history | edited | Michael HamptonMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
This really should be done in some form, still
|
| Jan 14, 2013 at 9:49 | comment | added | John Gardeniers | "general reference: This question wouldn't have been asked if you'd just bothered to read the documentation." | |
| Jan 14, 2013 at 8:17 | answer | added | Ward - Trying CodidactMod | timeline score: 6 | |
| Jan 14, 2013 at 7:18 | history | edited | Michael Hampton | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 106 characters in body
|
| Jan 14, 2013 at 7:09 | history | asked | Michael Hampton | CC BY-SA 3.0 |