Timeline for Retag [backupexec] to [backup-exec]?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2010 at 18:08 | history | migrated | from meta.stackexchange.com (revisions) | ||
| Jun 28, 2010 at 11:03 | comment | added | Vivi | As @Ben said, we tend to follow rather than create a new tag, but that doesn't mean it is the best way of doing it. If things can be improved, why not do it? | |
| Jun 27, 2010 at 17:01 | comment | added | Jon Seigel | I agree with this. The goal of tags is categorization, and if there's no confusion between tags, then we should let it slide until tag synonyms are implemented -- at that point, we can display whatever we want, even if the users input the old tag. @Ben | |
| Jun 26, 2010 at 23:01 | comment | added | Ben | You say there's no confusion with the current tag, which is true - but probably because everyone has gone with the suggested backupexc. I know I've gone to add a backup exec tag before, and just used backupexec because that's what it suggested, even though I disagree. If the system suggested backup-exec, that's what I'd use. | |
| Jun 26, 2010 at 21:48 | history | answered | Zoredache | CC BY-SA 2.5 |