Timeline for Why do people censor serverfault questions that are interesting and valuable due to personal bias?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2010 at 18:08 | history | migrated | from meta.stackexchange.com (revisions) | ||
| Jun 28, 2010 at 14:51 | comment | added | ErikA | It's a peer-to-peer Q&A forum. If you spend some time here, you'll certainly see that there is a great deal of innovative thought that goes on. In this case, though, that innovative thought is directed at solving concrete, real-world problems, not so much on theoretical questions. | |
| Jun 28, 2010 at 14:50 | comment | added | Grace Note | @msacks We're not a forum. We're a question-and-answer site. People ask questions, they get solid answers. These can involve innovative and well-articulated thoughts, but those thoughts do not require discussion. And judging by what everyone else is saying about your question, it was leaning more towards the open-ended discussion route rather than a question with an answer. | |
| Jun 28, 2010 at 14:48 | comment | added | please delete me | I don't feel the need to. Perhaps this is not the right forum for thought that involves innovative thought, but is more of a support forum, is that accurate? | |
| Jun 28, 2010 at 14:42 | history | answered | ErikA | CC BY-SA 2.5 |