Timeline for Editing not-so-good Questions
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:14 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
|
|
| Aug 3, 2010 at 5:03 | comment | added | Andrew | @John that was a hypothetical ServerFault question; this is what I'd edit the question into. Perhaps a bad example as it's too close to a real question. | |
| Aug 2, 2010 at 5:09 | comment | added | John Gardeniers | as the question isn't on one of this trilogy's sites, I am unfamiliar with the site on which it is asked and I'm unfamiliar with the topic itself it's not an easy one to respond to. However, my first though was that it could well stand being edited into something a lot more meaningful. The wording looks to me to be the result of a language problem more than anything else. In short, killing it would not be my first response. | |
| Jul 29, 2010 at 3:07 | comment | added | Andrew | @John What would you do with this CW example, edit it or kill it? | |
| Jul 28, 2010 at 5:17 | comment | added | John Gardeniers | The way I see it, Community Wiki does serve a purpose because it allows questions to be asked (and answered) that really have no right or wrong answer and would otherwise be too subjective and possibly be killed off. | |
| Jul 28, 2010 at 2:35 | history | answered | Andrew | CC BY-SA 2.5 |