Skip to main content
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
Source Link

I have seen, and voted on, quite a few questions that are and indeed should be closed as NARQ, despite having answers. I can't see why it having answers should make any difference. For the particular question you linked I admit I don't see why it was closed as NARQ but the fact that it does have an answer still makes no difference.

I think you're forgetting that there is a huge difference between not a real question in absolute terms compared to not a real question within the context of the site FAQ.

This oneThis one is a good example of what I mean.

I have seen, and voted on, quite a few questions that are and indeed should be closed as NARQ, despite having answers. I can't see why it having answers should make any difference. For the particular question you linked I admit I don't see why it was closed as NARQ but the fact that it does have an answer still makes no difference.

I think you're forgetting that there is a huge difference between not a real question in absolute terms compared to not a real question within the context of the site FAQ.

This one is a good example of what I mean.

I have seen, and voted on, quite a few questions that are and indeed should be closed as NARQ, despite having answers. I can't see why it having answers should make any difference. For the particular question you linked I admit I don't see why it was closed as NARQ but the fact that it does have an answer still makes no difference.

I think you're forgetting that there is a huge difference between not a real question in absolute terms compared to not a real question within the context of the site FAQ.

This one is a good example of what I mean.

added 98 characters in body
Source Link
John Gardeniers
  • 27.7k
  • 23
  • 38

I have seen, and voted on, quite a few questions that are and indeed should be closed as NARQ, despite having answers. I can't see why it having answers should make any difference. For the particular question you linked I admit I don't see why it was closed as NARQ but the fact that it does have an answer still makes no difference.

I think you're forgetting that there is a huge difference between not a real question in absolute terms compared to not a real question within the context of the site FAQ.

This one is a good example of what I mean.

I have seen, and voted on, quite a few questions that are and indeed should be closed as NARQ, despite having answers. I can't see why it having answers should make any difference. For the particular question you linked I admit I don't see why it was closed as NARQ but the fact that it does have an answer still makes no difference.

I think you're forgetting that there is a huge difference between not a real question in absolute terms compared to not a real question within the context of the site FAQ.

I have seen, and voted on, quite a few questions that are and indeed should be closed as NARQ, despite having answers. I can't see why it having answers should make any difference. For the particular question you linked I admit I don't see why it was closed as NARQ but the fact that it does have an answer still makes no difference.

I think you're forgetting that there is a huge difference between not a real question in absolute terms compared to not a real question within the context of the site FAQ.

This one is a good example of what I mean.

Source Link
John Gardeniers
  • 27.7k
  • 23
  • 38

I have seen, and voted on, quite a few questions that are and indeed should be closed as NARQ, despite having answers. I can't see why it having answers should make any difference. For the particular question you linked I admit I don't see why it was closed as NARQ but the fact that it does have an answer still makes no difference.

I think you're forgetting that there is a huge difference between not a real question in absolute terms compared to not a real question within the context of the site FAQ.