Skip to main content
added 491 characters in body
Source Link
Chris S Mod
  • 78.3k
  • 36
  • 72

The "low quality"Some of the review audit needsaudits need work. Most of the audits have high passing scores, no problems.

WeIn some areas we have a failure rate over 50%, but whenand I manually 'graded'can see many of them we hadgoing either way. The audit system was supposed to give clear examples, where anyone with a 90%+ pass ratebrain could get it right. That's not the case right now in many of them.

One note, several of the queues only use moderator actions as indications of the "correct" answer. In this question a moderator deleted the Answer, so that was the correct answer here. Moderators can be fickle at times, so I don't completely agree with this basis. Also, unless you went out of your way you couldn't see that there was another answer.

A side note to that last note, moderators have been cracking down on crappy answers. So you have to be very strict with your review else you'll end up on the "wrong" side of an opinion as to whether a post is good enough.

All I can say for now is that they're still tweaking the system and you're not the only one.

The "low quality" review audit needs work. Most of the audits have high passing scores, no problems.

We have a failure rate over 50%, but when I manually 'graded' them we had a 90%+ pass rate.

All I can say for now is that they're still tweaking the system and you're not the only one.

Some of the review audits need work. Most of the audits have high passing scores, no problems.

In some areas we have a failure rate over 50%, and I can see many of them going either way. The audit system was supposed to give clear examples, where anyone with a brain could get it right. That's not the case right now in many of them.

One note, several of the queues only use moderator actions as indications of the "correct" answer. In this question a moderator deleted the Answer, so that was the correct answer here. Moderators can be fickle at times, so I don't completely agree with this basis. Also, unless you went out of your way you couldn't see that there was another answer.

A side note to that last note, moderators have been cracking down on crappy answers. So you have to be very strict with your review else you'll end up on the "wrong" side of an opinion as to whether a post is good enough.

All I can say for now is that they're still tweaking the system and you're not the only one.

Source Link
Chris S Mod
  • 78.3k
  • 36
  • 72

The "low quality" review audit needs work. Most of the audits have high passing scores, no problems.

We have a failure rate over 50%, but when I manually 'graded' them we had a 90%+ pass rate.

All I can say for now is that they're still tweaking the system and you're not the only one.