Skip to main content
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
Source Link

I was checking the edit queue and found a suggested edit to remove a link to the answers own blog. It wasn't declared, and looking at the profile it is obvious it belongs to him, however it appears that the answer might contain decent information to the question. Should we accept/edit these links out, or downvote them and flag them for self promotion? This answer in question is here: http://serverfault.com/a/496819/60820https://serverfault.com/a/496819/60820

I was checking the edit queue and found a suggested edit to remove a link to the answers own blog. It wasn't declared, and looking at the profile it is obvious it belongs to him, however it appears that the answer might contain decent information to the question. Should we accept/edit these links out, or downvote them and flag them for self promotion? This answer in question is here: http://serverfault.com/a/496819/60820

I was checking the edit queue and found a suggested edit to remove a link to the answers own blog. It wasn't declared, and looking at the profile it is obvious it belongs to him, however it appears that the answer might contain decent information to the question. Should we accept/edit these links out, or downvote them and flag them for self promotion? This answer in question is here: https://serverfault.com/a/496819/60820

Source Link
Jacob
  • 9.3k
  • 15
  • 9

Do we edit self promotion or leave it to be down voted?

I was checking the edit queue and found a suggested edit to remove a link to the answers own blog. It wasn't declared, and looking at the profile it is obvious it belongs to him, however it appears that the answer might contain decent information to the question. Should we accept/edit these links out, or downvote them and flag them for self promotion? This answer in question is here: http://serverfault.com/a/496819/60820