Timeline for Inadequate Review Audit Test
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:32 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 13:35 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 9:11 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| Jun 26, 2013 at 18:14 | comment | added | Chris S Mod | DevOps - Set sail for fail! | |
| Jun 26, 2013 at 18:11 | comment | added | Scott Pack | They got both kinds: buggy and crap. | |
| Jun 26, 2013 at 18:01 | comment | added | Michael Hampton Mod | Review audits being crap is a whole separate issue. This one's just plain buggy (and crap). | |
| Jun 26, 2013 at 18:00 | comment | added | Scott Pack | Which is terrible because I would have closed that shit anyway. I just mark that up to the review audits having a surprisingly high failure rate. | |
| Jun 26, 2013 at 17:48 | history | edited | Michael HamptonMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 59 characters in body
|
| Jun 26, 2013 at 17:38 | history | answered | Michael HamptonMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |