Timeline for Why was my question on high-performance-networking put on hold?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:14 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
|
|
Jul 26, 2013 at 1:18 | comment | added | Nathan C | @cnst Here you go | |
Jul 26, 2013 at 1:17 | comment | added | cnst | wow, thank you for showing more ignorance! I'm still to receive the search phrase you've used that provides just so many different tools to choose from. The whole point of duckduckgo, BTW, is that it doesn't give different answers to different users, and it's actually based on Google and Bing. | |
Jul 26, 2013 at 1:14 | comment | added | cnst | And, BTW, are you kidding me? This is my exact comment: Completely false; you're limited by the network buffers of TCP on both ends in scenarios that involve real broadband connections. – cnst 7 hours ago, to which you've trolled, @cnst That's not correct. Slower links don't magically go faster because a bigger pipe said to. – Nathan C 7 hours ago | |
Jul 26, 2013 at 1:13 | comment | added | Nathan C | By the way, this was the first result of a Google search. Terrible search engines don't count. | |
Jul 26, 2013 at 1:13 | comment | added | cnst | If you have no clue of the subject matter, why are you rushing to answer? Also, I did actually point people out in the right direction, it's not exactly my fault that it fell on death ears: my explicit hints were missed by so many people that have, apparently, NEVER heard of BDP, yet thought they're qualified to answer a question on GigE internet (not LAN). | |
Jul 26, 2013 at 0:49 | comment | added | Nathan C | @cnst Then, it's helpful to point out how to improve instead of saying "it's plain wrong". Think about how you'd react if you saw someone respond to an answer like that you spent time researching. | |
Jul 26, 2013 at 0:31 | comment | added | cnst | The original answer, to my comment of which you're referring, was basically just a link to one such tool, without any kind of basic info on how to use it in a simple way that fits the question, and it originally even contained information that was outright wrong. I believe it is an SE policy that a link is not an answer. The answer has since been amended, and is now quite satisfactory. | |
Jul 26, 2013 at 0:28 | comment | added | cnst | Please kindly provide a duckduckgo link which has the "tons" of tools that you're referring to. | |
Jul 26, 2013 at 0:21 | history | answered | Nathan C | CC BY-SA 3.0 |