Skip to main content
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
Source Link

This questionThis question popped up in my review queue for "vote to reopen" requests. I voted to leave it closed, and got everyone's favorite condescending warning:

This was an audit, designed to see if you were paying attention. You didn't pass. There are no major problems with this question.

While normally I agree with these...in this case, what the heck? The "question" has no question. This sort of non-question gets closed all the time.

This question popped up in my review queue for "vote to reopen" requests. I voted to leave it closed, and got everyone's favorite condescending warning:

This was an audit, designed to see if you were paying attention. You didn't pass. There are no major problems with this question.

While normally I agree with these...in this case, what the heck? The "question" has no question. This sort of non-question gets closed all the time.

This question popped up in my review queue for "vote to reopen" requests. I voted to leave it closed, and got everyone's favorite condescending warning:

This was an audit, designed to see if you were paying attention. You didn't pass. There are no major problems with this question.

While normally I agree with these...in this case, what the heck? The "question" has no question. This sort of non-question gets closed all the time.

Post Closed as "Duplicate" by Chris S
Source Link
larsks
  • 46.7k
  • 15
  • 7

Review "audit" seems incorrect?

This question popped up in my review queue for "vote to reopen" requests. I voted to leave it closed, and got everyone's favorite condescending warning:

This was an audit, designed to see if you were paying attention. You didn't pass. There are no major problems with this question.

While normally I agree with these...in this case, what the heck? The "question" has no question. This sort of non-question gets closed all the time.