Timeline for Review "audit" seems incorrect? [duplicate]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:14 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
|
|
| May 25, 2014 at 3:51 | history | closed | Chris SMod | Duplicate of Who chooses the questions for review audit? I failed a highly debatable one | |
| Jul 28, 2013 at 21:08 | comment | added | pauska | It happens to everyone, like me: meta.serverfault.com/questions/5502/… | |
| Jul 27, 2013 at 6:39 | answer | added | Michael HamptonMod | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jul 27, 2013 at 2:35 | comment | added | Michael Hampton Mod | Hey, it was upvoted to +5.. | |
| Jul 27, 2013 at 2:21 | comment | added | Scott Pack | It feels like about a third of the audits are bad. Given that they must assume that still open questions are good examples we're more likely simply missing things that are closable. | |
| Jul 27, 2013 at 2:10 | comment | added | larsks | But no worries. | |
| Jul 27, 2013 at 2:10 | comment | added | larsks | Yeah, I realize that. I just thought that this particular audit stood out as being slightly odd. | |
| Jul 27, 2013 at 2:08 | comment | added | Chris S Mod | The TL;DR version: Don't worry about it, we know, you aren't penalized. | |
| Jul 27, 2013 at 1:38 | history | asked | larsks | CC BY-SA 3.0 |