Timeline for Integrate cloudshark's service
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
21 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2020 at 10:00 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:14 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
|
|
| Sep 25, 2013 at 13:13 | comment | added | Tim Post Staff | Just a ping to let you know that we didn't forget about this, the devs have just been really busy. We're going to look at feasibility soon. | |
| Sep 7, 2013 at 16:35 | comment | added | the-wabbit | @TheCleaner you always can sanitize manually before uploading by running it through a netexpect script or tcprewrite, but obviously, it would be more convenient to have this functionality in Cloudshark itself. As of now, there seems to be no such functionality. | |
| Sep 7, 2013 at 9:18 | comment | added | the-wabbit | I forgot the most important point - if we had Cloudshark integration, we would be able to provide even more valuable advice on @KyleBrandt 's sophisticated networking questions. | |
| Sep 4, 2013 at 22:25 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/ServerFault/status/375384266609541121 | ||
| Sep 4, 2013 at 13:39 | comment | added | TheCleaner | Is there a way to obscure/sanitize IPs or FQDNs? I don't care personally, but there are bound to be people that wouldn't use it unscrubbed even if the IP info was internal LAN info only. | |
| Sep 4, 2013 at 7:05 | comment | added | user9517 |
I'm not convinced this will be overly useful and I can see it now I have network problem - here my cloudsharkz, pleeez halp k thnks bai
|
|
| Sep 4, 2013 at 4:09 | answer | added | Mark HendersonMod | timeline score: 4 | |
| Sep 3, 2013 at 22:53 | history | edited | the-wabbit | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 802 characters in body
|
| Sep 3, 2013 at 21:37 | comment | added | Mark Henderson Mod | I have shared wireshark screenshots multiple times in questions asking for help, or demonstrating an issue. I think this would be very cool, but I do wonder if that many people will use it | |
| Sep 3, 2013 at 20:11 | comment | added | the-wabbit | @RobM It has cool looks. I am under the impression that anything with fancy visuals is getting to the top of the queue speedily as it is a magnet for visitors. | |
| Sep 3, 2013 at 20:10 | comment | added | Tom O'Connor Mod | Perhaps what we should request is an application platform.. so people can write apps to run on the SE platform. | |
| Sep 3, 2013 at 17:42 | comment | added | Rob Moir | Oh don't get me wrong, I support the idea, I upvoted it and all.. I'm just wondering how to justify it as any kind of priority to SO devs. | |
| Sep 3, 2013 at 17:06 | comment | added | the-wabbit | Although people do not "express a wish to share captures", in many cases captures would add great value to the questions. I would have hoped that inclusion of captures would happen on a more regular, even frequent basis if we had such a facility integrated in the "ask question" form. | |
| Sep 3, 2013 at 17:04 | comment | added | sysadmin1138 Mod | It does happen once in a while, usually through a locker service somewhere. I've reviewed a few captures from SF questions. This would make things more convenient! | |
| Sep 3, 2013 at 16:30 | comment | added | voretaq7 Mod | @RobM we do occasionally request packet captures - it would be convenient to display them in a nice format. Images are currently hosted through "an arrangement" with imgur (among other things, our images don't get expired away) -- perhaps a similar "arrangement" could be reached with cloudshark. | |
| Sep 3, 2013 at 16:30 | comment | added | Zoredache | There are a couple sites that may want this. networkengineering.stackexchange.com, and security.stackexchange.com seems like they might occasionally want this. | |
| Sep 3, 2013 at 16:21 | comment | added | Rob Moir | While I like the idea in principle, have a +1 and all that, I'm not sure I've seen very many people express a wish to share traffic captures with us... | |
| Sep 3, 2013 at 16:02 | comment | added | the-wabbit | Since this is a feature mainly concerning the SF main site (and probably of little interest to other sites, possibly with the exception of U&L.SE and NE.SE), I posted this question to meta.SF. | |
| Sep 3, 2013 at 16:01 | history | asked | the-wabbit | CC BY-SA 3.0 |