Timeline for Should Server Fault stop accepting questions from unregistered users?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2013 at 12:58 | comment | added | TheCleaner | @Cypher I don't put a lot of stock on questions with small votes, but questions with even 10+ votes on this site nowadays is very likely to be a good question. Ward even made the argument a while back that voting is essential to this site's progress/upkeep. | |
| Sep 17, 2013 at 11:26 | comment | added | user9517 | @Cypher: Serverfault gets just 113 questions/day so they hang around for long enough for a view to be formed on their quality. Contrast this with Stack Overflow which gets 7k questions/day and questions are gone before you can see them. | |
| Sep 17, 2013 at 0:38 | comment | added | Cypher | I wouldn't put a whole lot of stock on the voting being synonymous to 'good' questions. The voting aspect to this site is more of a social experiment than a true measure of quality. There's also the volume aspect to consider. With so many questions being posted, visibility of a question goes from seen to forgotten really quickly, which also affects votes, number of answers, etc. | |
| Sep 16, 2013 at 14:30 | history | answered | TheCleaner | CC BY-SA 3.0 |